<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>John Willis's Blog</title>
    <link>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe</link>
    <description>Main focus is Enterprise Systems Management however on any given day who knows.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.0.2 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-31T18:52:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mission Impossible</title>
      <link>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/2007/12/31/mission-impossible</link>
      <description>&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;h2&gt;&lt;span&gt;The IBM ESM Integration Story&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last night, I attended a Tivoli User Group (TUG) meeting in Atlanta.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the presentations was on IBM's new Tivoli Service Request&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Manager product. During the presentation, my mind started to wander,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and I wondered how difficult it must have been for IBM just to get this&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;far in its story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/spacer.gif"&gt;&lt;img dynsrc="#" href="#" lowsrc="#" src="http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/spacer.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the past five years it has acquired at least eight companies in the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;enterprise systems management space alone. I am not talking about just&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the coding efforts. I just can't imagine the cultures, the management,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and coordination it must have taken just to be able to show the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Powerpoint slide of its integration road map. So, before I tell you the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;two questions that I posed to the presenter, let's do a little&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;refresher.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chart of IBM ESM Related Acquisitions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;YEAR&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;ACQUISITION&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;ESM PRODUCT INTEGRATION&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2003&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Think Dynamics&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tivoli Provisioning Manager (TPM)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2003&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rational Software&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager  ITCAM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2004&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Candle&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2004&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cyanea&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager  (ITCAM)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2005&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Collation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager  (TADDM)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;MicroMuse&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tivoli Netcool , IBM Tivoli Network Manager for IP  (ITNMIP), Tivoli Business Systems Manager (TBSM)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;MRO Software&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tivoli Service Request Manager&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;2007&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cognos&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;TBD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Think Dynamics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The major changes in the traditional Tivoli stack started in 2003&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;with the acquisition of the privately held Think Dynamics. Think&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dynamics provided provisioning and orchestration technology. My&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;uneducated guess is that, by the end of 2007, more than half of the IBM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;customer base has not fully converted from the old Tivoli Configuration&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;manager product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rational Software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that same year IBM purchased Rational Software. I believe that&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM has had reasonably success with the penetration of its Rational&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;products. HP, however, still has a strong hold in the testing market&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;with the Mercury tools. Rational products have leaked into some of the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;enterprise systems, products such as IBM Tivoli Composite Applications&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Monitor (ITCAM), which is primarily used for synthetic transactions and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;transaction response timings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Candle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most IBM insiders will tell you that IBM purchased Candle for its Z&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;penetration and residuals. Somewhere along the way, however, it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;realized that it could gain mammoth savings by shelving its IBM Tivoli&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Monitoring version 5 upgrade development effort and by just using the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Candle product as the new ITM version 6. Very similar to the Think&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dynamics customer transition story, it has been difficult for many of&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM's monitoring customer to make a clean conversion over to the new&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Candle technology&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cyanea&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cyanea was small three-year-old company that IBM had invested in at&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;an early stage with an 11% holding. Cyanea has been integrated into the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ITCAM family of products.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Collation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Collation was probably the best per-price acquisition that IBM has&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;made in the last few years. The Collation discovery application will be&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the linchpin for all the Tivoli products. The new name of the Collation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;software is called Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(TADDM). TADDM puts the "C" in IBM's CCMDB. IBM describes its CCMDB as&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;both discovery and CMDB. In my opinion, you can't have one without the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;other. If IBM actually pulls off this massive integration of all these&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;products, it is TADDM that is going to make it sail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MicroMuse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This acquisition will put the final nail in what we Tivoli old&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;timers have called home for the last years. Netview, which actually&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;came from the original HP Openview code base, is finally dead. The new&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM Tivoli Network Manager for IP products is the official replacement&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;for Netview. Now, IBM claims that it is the only vendor that can do the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;whole layer 2 through 7 stack and that it can do layer 0 as well. Also,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM says that its go forward strategy for event management and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;correlation is the Netcool Omnibus product line. What , no more TEC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prolog? Good riddance. IBM is saying that Tivoli Enterprise Console&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;still has a shelf life until circa 2012; however, I am not waiting&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;around. Another area where MicroMuse has made a big impact is the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;replacement of the Tivoli Business Systems Manager with the Netcool RAD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and Impact products. I wasn't a big fan of TBSM 3.x; the new TBSM 4.x&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Netcool) stuff is much better. Also, make sure that you now call it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the Tivoli Business Service Manager.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MRO Software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The IT service request story over the last ten years could make for&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a great adventure novel. In 1997 IBM paid $200 million for a company&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;called Software Artistry. These were the boom years for Tivoli. Sales&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;were vertical, champagne was flowing, everyone was feeding off the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;trough. Even lowly consultants such as myself were driving Cadillac&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;rentals and staying in the Ritz. IBM was selling a great integration&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;story in the late nineties. Between 1996 and the end of 1997, IBM had&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;acquired Tivoli, Unison (Tivoli Workload Scheduler), and Software&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Artistry. No other company in the enterprise systems space could tout&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;that kind of integration story (sound familiar?). The Peregrine and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remedy replacement business was on fire. Then, the year 2k and the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;dot-bomb fizzle came. IBM unloaded the Service Desk product to none&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;other than Peregrine Systems for an undisclosed amount of money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, all those poor customers who had to convert from Peregrine's&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Service Center to Tivoli's Service Desk now had to convert back. A few&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;years later, Peregrine bought Remedy, and there was practically only&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;one vendor doing service request management at the enterprise level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somewhere along the way, Peregrine pulled an Enron and had to unload&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remedy on the cheap. The "M" (John Moores, owner of Peregrine) sells&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remedy to the B and C in BMC. In 2006, guess who has the best ITIL/CMDB&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;story? Somewhere along the way IBM gets religion and realizes the error&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;of its ways and tries to start an ITIL strategy. It realized that,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;without Asset, Problem, Change, and Config software, you are stuck with&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;just vapor. In 2006, IBM acquired MRO Software, and in 2007, it is back&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in the game with ITSRM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cognos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ironic part of this from an ESM perspective is that Tivoli used&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to have a product that OEM'd Congnos. It was called Tivoli Decision&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Support (TDS). TDS took Tivoli's DM 3.x monitoring data and built cubes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;using Cognos. It was a nightmare to implement. IBM Tivoli has recently&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;announced the Tivoli Common Reporting product (TCR) for common&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;reporting for all of its Tivoli portfolio. TCR is based on the Eclipse&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BIRT open source product. I am guessing, however, that this might&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;evolve into a stop gap. Why would IBM pay $5 billion for a company with&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;over 3500 employees and continue to use BIRT as its reporting tool?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Questions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now that we have completed the refresher, let me get to my two&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;questions. My first question was really more of a comment: "It looks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;like you have around two more year to go for complete integration." The&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;presenter disagreed with me and wanted to say that his demo was proof&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;that I was wrong (see my joke about demo's... &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" dynsrc="#" href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/open-source-software/my-views-on-oss-esm-part-4/" lowsrc="#" src="#"&gt;My  Views on OSS ESM (Part 4)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He went on to say that Gartner said the same thing a year ago and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;changed its story a few months ago after seeing the demo (see thoughts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;about this in &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" dynsrc="#" href="http://old.johnmwillis.com/?p=122" lowsrc="#" src="#"&gt;My Views on OSS ESM (Part  1)&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok, the demo, sure. So, when I asked him if he could tell me one&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fortune 5000 comnay that is currently running an integrated solution&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;with TPM, ITM, TADDM, Netcool OmniBus, and ITSRM, he said that he cold&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;name only one company that was running three of the five. I rest my&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;case. So, is IBM's ESM integration story a mission impossible? For any&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;other company, I would definitely say, "Yes." But IBM has a lot of&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;resources to make this all happen. If it does make it all happen, it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;will have the best story in ESM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/tags">ibm</category>
      <category domain="http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/tags">esm</category>
      <category domain="http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/tags">tivoli</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:53:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>botchagalupe</author>
      <guid>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/2007/12/31/mission-impossible</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-12-31T18:53:14Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>10 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/comment/mission-impossible</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/feeds/comments?blogPost=1050</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

