<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>John Willis's Blog</title>
    <link>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe</link>
    <description>Main focus is Enterprise Systems Management however on any given day who knows.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.0.2 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-31T02:02:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does ITIL Really Matter?</title>
      <link>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/2007/12/30/does-itil-really-matter</link>
      <description>&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know this question has been asked many times before but in the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;enterprise space it seems that ITIL is always a given. My thoughts are&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;maybe changes in the IT industry might change the need for ITIL. To be&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;clear on this I am not proposing to know the answer to this question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/spacer.gif"&gt;&lt;img dynsrc="#" href="#" lowsrc="#" src="http://www.johnmwillis.com/wp/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/images/spacer.gif"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Some Industry Considerations&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Five years ago when I would teach a class to enterprise customers I&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;would always ask all the customers how many servers do you manage? On a&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;good day I would get maybe 10k and only a couple of super&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;infrastructure banks would answer above 20k. Recently I have been&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;attending a number of open source meetings and I am meeting people who&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;tell me that their infrastructures have over 100k servers and I finding&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;more and more that these numbers are actually small in the new WEB 2.0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;world. I have talked to some consultants who are working with RackSpace&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and they have told me they have over 100k servers. A recent article by&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robin Harris suggests that Google might have over a million cores. I&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;can’t image how many servers Amazon is farming with their S3/EC2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;offerings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Changing the Game&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Companies like Facebook are adding 350k user’s a day and doubling&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ever six months. Virtual World networks like Second Life and Kaneva are&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;growing with numbers that are mind blowing. How do companies cope with&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;change in these types of environments? My belief is that they have two&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;options. One, they go and blow and don’t focus on traditional ITM/ESM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;techniques or two they change the game. If you look at what Google is&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;doing in Portland on the Columbia River, they are indeed changing the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;game. They are using free software and cheap hardware to build what&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;they call “Power Provisioning for a Warehouse-sized Computer”. I&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;recently attended an IBM session where their development lab in Markham&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ontario is completely virtual and is run by a giant provisioning system&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;called Tornado. IBM developers in this facility select their&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;provisioned system from a self service portal and its all on demand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the best example of a company changing the game is Amazon’s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amazon processes over 4 million purchase transactions per day utilizing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;over 150 different network services to deliver these successful&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;transactions. They are building their infrastructure based on the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google Three Rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li level="1" type="ol"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cheap Servers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - Mass produced low end servers, free software. Energy efficient switches and unmanaged switches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li level="1" type="ol"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Expect Failure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - Cheap hardware will fail. Therefore build recovery into the software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li level="1" type="ol"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scalability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - Create monster scalability. Google has created clusters that exceed 8000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enterprises like Google and Amazon are defining a new type of data&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;center. I compare it to RAID 1 for servers. Plan for failures the way&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;large companies plan for redundant electricity. This kind of future&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;could normalize IT to the status of electricity that is a true&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;commodity. If you take a closer look at Amazon’s Elastic Computing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cloud (EC2), today you are guaranteed 99.999% availability for your&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;servers and your total investment is a light switch and service bill&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;with no ITIL required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Willis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;johnmwillis.com &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/tags">itil</category>
      <category domain="http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/tags">cmdb</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>botchagalupe</author>
      <guid>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/2007/12/30/does-itil-really-matter</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-12-31T02:03:21Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>10 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>12</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/comment/does-itil-really-matter</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://openmanagement.org/blogs/botchagalupe/feeds/comments?blogPost=1032</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

